I know I'm meddling here. Area 3, or Practical Theology, is not my zone. But after being involved in pastoral ministry for about 26 years, sometimes it's hard for me to compartmentalize. I tend to think that's a good thing. I recently ran across the following article by Methodist Practical Theologian Kenneth Carder. He gets at something that I think is particularly needful, especially in the 21st century and especially for Pentecostal pastors. I'd like to hear your response.
A veteran pastor, whose ministry began in the turmoil of the 1960s, asked if I thought Amos, Micah, Isaiah, or Jeremiah would fit the definition of excellence in ministry.
“It seems as though ‘excellent ministry’ is being defined primarily in terms of growing and managing efficient and prosperous religious institutions,” he said. “I don’t hear much attention being paid to challenging the injustices and violence in the world. So, I doubt any of the prophets would make the list of excellent ministry.”
How would you respond? My immediate inclination was to remind him that the prophets he mentioned didn’t serve as pastors of congregations and that excellence in ministry includes a variety of contexts and expressions. But the questioner is a pastor, and he would argue that prophetic ministry is integral to the role of every pastor.
I admit my own resonance with the pastor’s question. I, too, began pastoral ministry in the 1960’s and am troubled by the pervasive silence of the contemporary church on such vexing topics as preemptive war, torture, racism, poverty, insidious consumerism, environmental destruction . . .
But the question itself may be too simplistic and even misleading. “Prophetic ministry” is as difficult to define as “excellent ministry.” Both concepts carry baggage in the contemporary context.
“Excellence” gets identified with the corporate business world, athletics, or marketing, and as a result, takes on images of self-generated achievement and elitism. “Prophetic” is typically associated with the political world and conjures up images of strident advocacy on behalf of legislation or denunciation of particular governmental policies.
While excellent ministry learns from the business world and requires personal gifts and effort, its foundation and fundamental character are derived from God’s presence, power, and purposes. While prophetic ministry includes engagement with politics and public advocacy, its foundation and fundamental character are grounded and formed in God’s vision for the whole of creation.
Prophetic ministry involves incorporating God’s reign of compassion, justice, generosity, and joy into personal values and actions, institutional structures, and governmental policies. It includes leading congregations to be alternative communities that look and act like God’s reconciled and redeemed community where “the orphans, widows, and strangers” are welcomed at God’s table of peace and abundance.
When excellence is used in relationship to Christian ministry it inevitably includes prophetic. Ministry without attentiveness to God’s vision for humanity (the prophetic) is not Christian ministry. And, prophetic ministry that fails to embody grace and competence falls short of Christian ministry.
Forming communities that embody God’s vision for the world is at the heart of all Christian ministry. In a politically and religiously polarized world, communities of civility and hospitality are prophetic communities. A world torn apart by violence and war pleads for an embodied message of peace and reconciliation.
When poverty and preventable diseases threaten the human family, policies and practices that care for “the least of these” are in the lineage of the prophets and Jesus. And when the eco-system is threatened with destruction, excellent ministry calls for stewardship of the creation God loves.
Would the Old Testament prophets make our list of excellent ministers? Perhaps a better question is, do our ministries and congregations include the vision, courage, and faithfulness embodied and proclaimed by the likes of Amos, Micah, Isaiah, and Jeremiah…and Jesus?
[Kenneth L. Carder is professor of the practice of pastoral formation at Duke Divinity School and a senior fellow with Pulpit & Pew: The Duke Center for Excellence in Ministry. He was bishop of the Mississippi Area of the United Methodist Church from 2000 to 2004 and the Nashville Area of the UMC from 1992 to 2000.]
6 comments:
This reminds me of a discussion in the book "The Shaping of Things to Come" by Michael Frost and Alan Hirsch who make a pitch for the 5-fold ministry (Apostles, Prophets, Evangelists, Pastors, Teachers) to be applied and integrated in the church. They contend that each of these must function in a local community for the body to be healthy. We often emphasize only pastors and teachers to the detriment of our churches. We recognize some individuals as "apostles" or "evangelists" who are really just gifted preachers. They also contend that each of these roles are more prominent during certain times in the life cycle of a church. It's an interesting read and approach by "postmodern" writers.
Interesting to consider that the roles are "seasonal"; that requires a lot of discernment on the part of the leadership of a church.
I heard Carder at one of the Lilly Project meetings I attended in Indianapolis. I was impressed with what he said and since then I have made it a point to read his work.
I've thought recently how most pastoral ministry/theology texts do not address the prophetic role. I think many of the problems Pentecostal pastors encounter come from the prophetic anointing which comes with their for ministry [which includes conviction, passion, etc]. When a prophetic word is delivered it normally is not well received by the hearers. Pastoral theology texts tend to endorse the "non-anxious presence" model.
I like Carder's notion of including the prophetic in the definition of excellence.
In many churches, a pastor must also be an adminstrator as much as a shepherd or prophet.
I think this is why we're seeing success (however you want to define that) from a team ministry approach which includes ministers with different sets of strengths, gifts, and callings.
It is also difficult to deliver a "prophetic message" to someone who is directly responsible for your paycheck. I think this results in a lot of anxiety and pinned up frustration in pastors who know what needs to be done or said but often choose to feed their families.
Perhaps this is why "evangelists" were popular. They said what pastors wished they could say. Much of their ministry dealt with church people in the church not unchurched people who don't dare come to church.
Loran Livingston told our students (you may have been there) "If you pastor a church, don't ever allow your church to go in debt; it will change your preaching."
The prophetic role of guys like Isaiah (palace writing prophet) and some others was culturally light years away from our golfing, businesslike churchmen. I have often thought of them like Bob Dylans (who we have a cultural place for), but the palace ones (unlike Amos, etc.) I believe were more enmeshed in the politic (ex. Uzziah, Isaiah's friend) than we are culturally able to discern. The present day pastor is a combination of priest and community organizer, not prophet.
anytime that the Word is proclaimed and encounters us it is prophetic. even if the contexts in which proclamation is made vastly differ it does not matter. the prophetic Word makes the prophet, the prophet does not make the prophetic Word.
Post a Comment